Survey says...WSAZ Blog Listing
Survey says...
Topic Author: Scott Saxton
Posted: 7:08 PM Feb 6, 2008
Replies Posted: 2 comments
Save Email Print
 del.icio.us   Google   Yahoo  digg
Recent Blog Topics
3 Strategies for an Obama Victory in WV
No One Apparently Wants to be at W.Va's Special Session
West Virginia: "Safely Republican"
What is the Past Tense of Swing?
Manchin in a Pickle
This time we Did it to Ourselves
Post Your Comments
First Name:
Email (optional):
Location:
Enter Comments:  
   characters left
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.

Survey says...

Among the candidates, the campaign staff and the hard core Republican voters Tuesday at the first ever West Virginia GOP Convention was a group of students from West Virginia Wesleyan.  The college class joined Dr. Rob Rupp, a political observer who I've known for years, for the historic event and an experiment.  The students handed out surveys to convention-goers and heard back from a third of them.

Several of the questions involved demographic information, but the one I was interested in pertained to the current commander in chief, George W. Bush.  Rupp's class asked those in attendance what effect the Bush presidency has had on the Republican party.  They gave voters a choice from 1 to 5, 1 being negative and 5 being positive.  The students got an interesting response.  54 percent considered the Bush presidency to have a moderate or negative impact on the Republican Party.  The way I read that is moderate meant 3...so more than half scored a 3 or below for the current administration.  43% said the president has had a positive impact on the Republican party -- less than half.

Here's a funny sidenote to this survey.  One of the other questions asked Republicans to rate their political ideology on a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being liberal and 5 being conservative.  1% said they were liberal.  By my calculator, that means 4 of the folks who responded claimed to be liberal.  Liberal?  At a Republican convention? 

Now I've heard for years that many Republican-minded politicians have registered as Democrats just to get elected.  After all, Democrats hold a 2 to 1 majority in registered voters. 

But what kind of disadvantage are you giving yourself if you're a liberal in a mostly Democratic state who registered as a Republican?  That's like spotting Tom Brady a couple touchdowns before you start the Super Bowl.  (That analogy had much more oomph to it up until last week of course.)

Read Comments
Posted by: Sue It is true that alot of candidates register as Democrats just to win. In fact, a politician whose campaign I worked on in my undergrad did this. In my own observations, there are a good number of people in WV who vote Democrat out of tradition and not out of conviction. If you question them, they are pro-life, believe in limited government, etc but these are not traditionally a Dem's position. (Of course, there are exceptions). As for professors, I tend not to talk politics with professors as they are usually toe tag narrowminded liberals who have no clue what they are talking about.

Posted by: Stephen I listened to Mr. Huckabee's acceptance speech for the republican nomination in Arkansas and I have since listened to his speech requesting the nominations in West Virginia. My conclusion: WE DO NOT NEED A PRESIDENT TO SPREAD HATE! Our Honorable Governor Joe Manchin delivered his STATE OF THE STATE address and showed great enthusiasm for School Spirit, State Pride, Empowering our teachers (which i am not), and most of all ACCEPTANCE. All leading to a state of DIVERSITY! In My opinion "DIVERSITY" should be a mandatory class prior to graduation from HIGH SCHOOL and continuously taught by every LICENSED Educator.