Local Doctors Disagree with New Mammogram Recommendations
Save Email Print
Updated: 6:51 PM Nov 17, 2009
Local Doctors Disagree with New Mammogram Recommendations
The latest recommendation from a government task force says women in their 40s should not get routine mammograms.
Posted: 6:25 PM Nov 17, 2009
Reporter: Carrie Cline
Email Address: carrie.cline@wsaz.com
Font Size:

HUNTINGTON, W.Va. (WSAZ) -- How much is a life worth? If you're under 50 wanting a mammogram, one group says not very much. The latest recommendation from a government task force says women in their 40s should not get routine mammograms. It's information that isn't sitting well with many.

“I had both breasts removed and reconstruction at the time of surgery," Lisa Maxey said. "I just recently got implants. It's been a trying time."

But not nearly as trying as if Maxey hadn't caught her breast cancer early. The 44-year-old mother thanks a mammogram for the early detection.

“If I hadn't had mammogram, I wouldn't have known," she said. "How can someone say don't get a mammogram until your 50?”

But that's exactly what a federal government task force is saying. They've released new recommendations say women under 50 no longer need routine mammograms. The group's previous recommendation was for routine screenings every year or two for women 40 and older.

“They determined it was beneficial in women 50 and up, but not beneficial in those between 40 and 49," said Dr. Jim Morgan, co-director of the Breast Center at St. Mary's Medical Center. "So, they determined mammograms did save lives, just not enough.”

Dr. Morgan, who's a breast surgeon, says he absolutely disagrees with the latest recommendations.

“They looked at survival as the only benefit," he said. "But, they didn't consider benefits or treatment options.”

Another concern -- insurance coverage of mammograms in women under 50. Dr. Vera Rose is the vice president of oncology at St. Mary's and is fearful of that outcome.

“The task force works for Medicare, and insurance companies usually follow suit," she said. "So, if Medicare stops paying for coverage in women under 50, it could deter people.”

“Who are they to say because I’m not 50, I’m not worth paying for a mammogram? It’s not right,” Maxey said.

The new recommendations do not apply to women under 50 who have increased risks or family history. One very important thing to point out is that the task force is one of many entities to make recommendations. The American Cancer Society has not called for a change in recommendations, and most local physicians are sticking with those guidelines of 40 and over.


Latest Comments

Posted by: Angela on Nov 24, 2009 at 09:55 AM

Whoever made that statement in regards to not having mammograms until the age of 50 is crazy. I was diagnosis with Breast Cancer at the age of 44, which if that policy was in effect then I would be dead now, my cancer was very aggressive. I found the lump during my self examination in April of 2005. Early detection is the key, do not put off getting your mammograms or doing self breast exams it is very important at any age. You should focus on the women's health and well being not the almighty dollar. Please do not sentence future women from not being able to have mammograms and be instructed in breast exams because of your stupidity, without those things you could be sentencing those women to a death sentence.
Posted by: Jen on Nov 21, 2009 at 01:13 AM

I was 17 when I found 3 lumps in my breast.. I found one on my own. the mamogram showed 2 more.. I had surgery and treament right away!! i am here today due to early detection!! I am now 32 yrs old. I have another lump were working on it got another biopsy! Half my family died of breast cancer.. and I went thru in the beginning "Your too young for a mamogram, your insurance wont pay" I paid for that mamogram outta my own money!! I knew something was wrong!! Cancer dosn't discriminate!! It doesn't matter how old you are! Insurance companies already try to get outta everthing!! Now you just gave them them x-mas!!
Posted by: J on Nov 18, 2009 at 10:05 PM

Rich and Me, this was a government recommendation, not an insurance panel recommendation. You know why insurance pays 100% for preventative care? It's cheaper to prevent than to cure. The same in this case. The sooner the cancer is found, the cheaper and less aggressive therapy can be used. IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH OBAMACARE.
Live Feed Now on the Always On Channel
NBC News Watercooler Video


WSAZ.com Sponsor Sections & Links
WSAZ Olympic Zone web channel
Full 2010 Olympic coverage from the WSAZ Olympic Zone.
Healthy Connections Healthy Connections
Find a local health professional
Healthy Tri-State
Tips to live a healthier lifestyle
WV Lottery
Nightly drawings and numbers
SOMC
Very good things are happening here
Moms4Moms presented by McDonald's
A collection of resources here to help Moms weather the daily storms that come along with parenting.
Big Sandy
For all your furniture and appliance needs