Owners of Abused Dog Speak
Owners of Abused Dog Speak Save Email Print
Posted: 8:38 PM Jul 31, 2008
Last Updated: 8:38 PM Jul 31, 2008
Reporter: Carrie Cline
Email Address: carrie.cline@wsaz.com

A | A | A

LAWRENCE COUNTY, Ohio (WSAZ) -- The owners of Hammer, a golden retriever found with a chain embedded in his neck, spoke Thursday about his extreme neglect.

The story first was broadcast Tuesday on WSAZ NewsChannel 3 and here at WSAZ.com.

“I got him from my aunt for Christmas of 2005," Amber Skinner said about Hammer. "He was really loud and hyper. He was nice; he was a great dog."

That's why Amber is so disturbed by what happened to Hammer, her former beloved pet. He had belonged to her and her father, Bruce Skinner.

Amber said she no longer lives with the dog or her dad. She visits them periodically and recalls their last visit three months ago.

“We went to his house to feed (Hammer) real quick because he's living with his girlfriend, and they're not allowed to have pets," Amber said. "We were visiting the dog. He still had the chain and everything, and I would go to loosen it up, and he would get out and try to run away. Dad told me not to do that.”

Three months later, the results turned tragic. Hammer had endured a heavy chain wrapped so tightly around his neck that it cut through the skin. The skin had been broken for so long that it closed around the chain.

Amber first saw the abuse on the news.

“I started crying," she said. "It upsets me that he is my dog. And then I trusted my dad with the dog, and he neglects it and abuses it. It's not right. I haven't gotten to talk with him about it yet, but I'm still really upset about it, and I wish he wouldn't have done it."

We contacted Bruce Skinner. He wouldn't talk to us on camera, but he did agree to answer our questions on the phone.

He said the whole incident baffles him, explaining that he moved to a place that doesn't allow pets. He said he left Hammer at his former home until he could find him a new home.

Bruce Skinner said he fed Hammer daily, but said Hammer broke loose from his chain "100 times." Since Hammer was always getting loose, Skinner began using a heavier chain. He said he couldn't tell the chain was cutting into Hammer's neck because his fur was so long.

" I may be negligent, but I'm not criminal," Bruce Skinner said.

Lawrence County Sheriff Tim Sexton and the county prosecutor are pursuing animal cruelty charges and said they will prosecute this case vigorously.

“We’ll prosecute the case," Sexton said. "Then, it’s up to the courts to decide what happens to him.”

As for Amber, it's a horrific situation that leaves her emotionally torn.

“I think if he's going to do that to my dog, then he should get punished for it because it's not right," she said. "You have to learn your lesson. But, then, he is my dad.”

Bruce Skinner said he loves dogs, having owned them throughout his life. He said he would never intentionally abuse a pet.

Animal cruelty is considered a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail and/or a $1,000 fine.

Meanwhile, Hammer continues to improve. His veterinarian has received nearly 200 calls from people wanting to adopt him. While Hammer currently is not adoptable, the Best Friends Animal Hospital, in cooperation with the Putnam County (W.Va.) Humane Society, have many other neglected dogs that need loving homes.

More Stories
Ohio Extends Unemployment Claims Hot Line Hours

New Ohio Attorney General, Treasurer take Office

Financial Fitness Can Raise Quality of Life

Your Weekend Ahead

Local Attorney to Run for Judge in Portsmouth

Man Charged with Shooting Neighbor, Victim Critically Injured

Police Search For Pharmacy Robber

Third Man Charged in Mason County Murder

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
Email will not be displayed on site. For station contact purpose only.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 18, 2008 at 10:19 AM
Before everyone is so quick to say Dr Mahnken is so great, someone needs to look into the fact that he lost his controled substance license and is in the process of a lawsuit by former employees to get his license revoked. Might want to look into that before Hammers future is placed in this mans hands

Posted by: Jason on Aug 8, 2008 at 04:13 PM
Negligence IS criminal. "Failure to exercise the degree of care considered reasonable under the circumstances, resulting in an unintended injury to another party."

Posted by: Pee Wee on Aug 7, 2008 at 10:56 AM
If this is in Chesapeake Court I hope Judge Capper for once punish those for animal cruelty.

Posted by: loves dogs on Aug 5, 2008 at 01:42 PM
This is a classic example of why a live animal should never be given to a child as a gift. Unfortunately, this is what happens to "the gift" when the child gets tired of caring for it, "the gift" gets old or they want something new. She was 11 yrs. old at the time. Not old enough for the huge responsibility of committing to the care of this dog for it's entire life. Most adults are incapable of this. As was the Dad, who clearly did not want this dog. The Aunt should have checked with him first (maybe she did?). Obviously, anyone who moves & does not take their dog with them does not want them. I only hope that the Judge does what is right by Hammer by punishing Mr. Skinner fully & allowing the dog to be adopted into a new, loving home. It deserves to live inside with people who love it and who will never put a logging chain around it's neck. Ever heard of a collar?? And, to the Aunt, next time buy a stuffed animal for your niece.

Posted by: To Dawn on Aug 4, 2008 at 11:53 PM
If people just pop in unexpectedly that's one thing, but if people are invited I think that I would take the vaccum to the couch or a lint brush or duct tape and try to get some of the hair off of the furniture before their arrival. I have a dog and we do not let her on the furniture at all just for this reason. Heck, I'm obsessive with having my own hair on my clothes, I don't want my dogs too. But hey, that's just me. No harm intended.

Posted by: Res on Aug 4, 2008 at 02:20 PM
Let's all hope Amber never has children.

Posted by: Ambers Mother on Aug 4, 2008 at 02:19 PM
I am blown away by the way people have been so quick to judge Amber. She is a 14 YEAR OLD GIRL who had very little contact with her dad, and lives a completely different life for over 10 years now. Hammer just happened to live with him. We as adults assume you take care of your pets and take them with you when you move. People keep asking us why we didn't go and get Hammer before this happened to him. Do you really think if we had known that we wouldn't have ? Amber was named "co-owner" and labeled with her father, when in fact she went on the air to let the public know that Hammer was loved and she does not agree with animal abuse. Can you imagine her horror, seeing her dog on tv, learning of his abuse and wondering what will happen to her dad ? She has not talked to him yet. We would like to thank the people that allowed her to visit Hammer, the ones that rescued him, and the ones that nursed him back to health. He is doing GREAT. AMBER AND HAMMER need your support and prayers.

Posted by: To Ria Ann.... on Aug 4, 2008 at 01:45 PM
It is an eye for an eye...WHEN THE OTHER PARTY IS A HUMAN! Does that mean everytime one of these worthless animals bites a human we should bite the dog? Seriously, that is the most insane reasoning I have ever heard :-)

Posted by: Ria Ann on Aug 4, 2008 at 11:54 AM
That man should have a heavy chain wrapped around his neck, so tight, so he can't even swallow! I belive an eye for a eye!!!!

Posted by: Sue on Aug 4, 2008 at 11:35 AM
I know the family, and I hate that this has happened. How long were they planning on leaving this dog tied up? I feel sorry for the dog, being chained up and not having anyone to love and care for it! People need to think before they give or get a pet as a gift for anyone!!!!!

Posted by: amy on Aug 4, 2008 at 09:40 AM
I hope the courts make an example out of (Mr.) Skinner

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 4, 2008 at 07:28 AM
To Luther has it right, do you really need that much protection? If so, protection from what/who? What kind of dogs are you talking about? Any one kind in general or just a dog in general? So what kind dog has provided with the most protection? What kind of dog has let you down the most? Just trying to learn something here is all.

Posted by: Dawn on Aug 4, 2008 at 07:13 AM
To All Non-Pet Owners Who Visit & Like to Complain About Our Pets ALSO to people who do not understand animals (dogs & cats) 1. They live here. You don't. 2. If you don't want their hair on your clothes, stay off the furniture. (That's why they call it "fur"niture.) 3. I like my pets a lot better than I like most people. 4. To you, it's an animal. To me, he/she is an adopted son/daughter who is short, hairy, walks on all fours and doesn't speak clearly.

Posted by: Becky on Aug 3, 2008 at 11:35 PM
This is a horrible story. How can someone not know that the chain is embedded into their pets neck? If Hammer was being fed and watered regularly and checked by a responsible owner with a heart this could not have ever happened. What's even more disturbing to me is the fact that the owner can receive a maximum of 6 months in jail and a $1000 fine for his abuse of an innocent animal!!! That's why these cold-hearted people can continue this type of behavior. They know it's a slap on the wrist if they are caught. I've always believed that if someone would treat an animal this way they would have no problem treating a child or anyone else with the same disrespect. We need tougher laws to punish these sickos. I hope Hammer's "owner" gets what he deserves and I hope Hammer finds a new loving home.

Posted by: STEPH on Aug 3, 2008 at 10:28 PM
IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THE LAW IS MORE CONCERN WITH ANIMAL'S GETTING ABUSED RATHER THAN CHILDREN GETTING ABUSED. I DON'T AGREE WITH ANIMAL CRUELTY BUT I STRONGLY DON'T AGREE WITH CHILD ABUSE.

Posted by: To Anonymouse on Aug 3 423 on Aug 3, 2008 at 09:40 PM
To keep people off of my property. That is all they are to me. They are very useless, and not really of much worth other than for protection.

Posted by: Heather on Aug 3, 2008 at 08:40 PM
Totally agree responsible pet owner! I do not allow any of my 3 dogs to roam down the roads without a leash and without me and/or my boyfriend. And they sure do not use the bathroom on another's lawn. Some owners are unaware of the chemicals that dog/cat feces/urine contains and that it can cause bare or yellow spots on grass and can kill plants. Plus, a lot of older generation males have no problem with shooting them with their rifle when they do go on their lawn. Which that is a problem, and I am an extreme animal lover, but things like that wouldn't happen if owners would keep their dogs inside or fenced in.

Posted by: responsiblepetowner on Aug 3, 2008 at 04:42 PM
This comment is in reference to LAWN and FLOWER LOVERS. I couldn't agree with you more. People do spend alot of money on their lawn and its maddening to have your neighbors cats to use your yard and flower beds as a litter box. I do have a dog, but she is not free to roam the neighborhood, getting in the trash and doing her business just where ever. We have half of our yard fenced in and I scoop everyday so my child will not get it. She is fixed and she gets fresh food and water everyday. I just feel if I am going to be a responsible petowner then everybody else should be too. CATS or DOGS should not be roamin the street. I am thinking about leasing one of the traps from the animal shelter and when I catch them, I am going to turn the garden hose loose on these critters and blast them for about 10 minutes. Then let them go and repeat as necessary...

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 3, 2008 at 04:23 PM
To Luther has it right, why do you keep getting animals if they don't mean anything to ya?

Posted by: don on Aug 3, 2008 at 03:29 PM
the ignorance displayed in some of these comments defy comprehension `````unbelievable!!!hope the poor dog makes it````and i will bet anything that when the dog sees the person who did this to````he will wag his tale!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Vicky on Aug 3, 2008 at 03:24 AM
Maxine, I speak my mind! Would you put your children on a chain in the backyard? How can you say you treat your dogs like family? Again, no dog or animal should be chained! I know people who think they are doing the dog a favor, but what kind of life is that for a dog? Yes, it's the same misery Hammer suffered!

Posted by: To all the rude and ignorant ppl on Aug 3, 2008 at 01:02 AM
omg how can some of these comments made by ppl be so ignorant animals have feelings also they are just alive as we are some of these ppl saying who cares there just dogs blah blah blah are probably animal abusers also...and say that noone cares well if we didn't we wouldn't comment or read these stories just because u are not happy with yourself don't try and bring everyone and everything down with ya!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Luther has it right on Aug 2, 2008 at 10:48 PM
You hit the nail on the head Luther. These "sick people" have some freakish love affair with animals and need to be set straight. I have several times before taken one of our animals down if need be, and would not bat an eye to do it again. Animals are nothing in the scheme of things.

Posted by: Animal Lover on Aug 2, 2008 at 09:31 PM
How can you say this is not abuse?That poor dog went WITHOUT any human love or affection.If tat dog was feed and loved daily then how can the LIAR say he did not know?That poor dog is about 3 yrs old and mor or less thinks that is normal!For shame,he needs somebody that will pet and love him forever.He needs a home for a family.And beleive me I know the are very loveable animals too. My uncle as one and she is just a big hug of love.It made my heart cry when I seen the abuse the poor dog went through.They should take both of them and put a chain around their necks in the hot, rain and cold and see how they like it!!I hope justice is strong on this case.Animals are here to be MANS BEST FREIND! AND YOU SHOULD TREAT THEM LIKE A FREIND AND CARE!!YOU ARE BOTH VERY BAD PEOPLE FOR WHAT YOU PUT HIM THROUGH!!

Posted by: Who's to Blame? on Aug 2, 2008 at 08:50 PM
WSAZ Print this! It is awful that this DOG was left with a heavy chain around it's neck this long! Did you ever notice most animals that are abused and left as strays or dropped off in areas, are done by ANIMAL OWNER'S,who call themselves ANIMAL LOVER'S! Why don't people who own these dogs put up proper fencing in their yards,so their animals can run and use LEASHES as ( CITY LAW REQURIES)to walk their CATS & DOGS and CARRY bags to clean up the crap! It seems you Animal Owner's, want to BLAME others and folks that choose not to have animals for what you do to your animals because you Break the Laws! This is one reason why they make Animal Laws,to PROTECT the Animals,their Owner's and the Folk's who Don't Own Animal's. Just Obey the Laws and No-One has a Problem!

Posted by: CC on Aug 2, 2008 at 06:50 PM
I personally think the owner should go through the same thing as the dog did. How cruel to treat animals this way! I am a HUGE animal lover and couldn't even watch this story on the news. I just listened and bawled my eyes out. The owner needs this to happen to him.

Posted by: ohhhhhh on Aug 2, 2008 at 06:47 PM
poor hammer....hope he is ok..i love animals

Posted by: carl on Aug 2, 2008 at 06:37 PM
stupid people!!!!!!!

Posted by: Maxine on Aug 2, 2008 at 05:48 PM
Hey Vicky you run your mouth before you meet people or thier dogs. I have four dogs that are tied up outside. My dogs have dog houses for shelter are feed and walked on a daily basis. They are all up to date on shots and tags. I pay my taxes on them and they are taken to a vet every 3 to 6 months and before that if needed. My dogs are spoiled rotten and are part of the family but are not allowed in the house or allowed to just run loose because they will fight each other. These dogs were thrown out along our road because noone wanted them. I didn't take them to the pound because our county kills animals when they are overpopulated, which is usually everyday because irresponsible owners who don't get thier animals fixed. Which all of mine are by the way.

Posted by: jim on Aug 2, 2008 at 05:02 PM
to nicemove, you are by far the dumbest person I've seen comment on here yet. How in the world is it the aunt's fault. Just shut your pie hole unless you can say something that actually is intelligent.

Posted by: LAWN and FLOWER LOVERS on Aug 2, 2008 at 01:53 PM
OBEY the LAWS on ANIMALS,take care of them.Do not mistreat them by turning them loose in the neighbor's yards,and steets to get hit with cars,and to bite some-one! Keep them in your own yards & houses,clean CRAP up after them,OR WALK IN IT,in YOUR OWN YARD'S,it's YOUR JOB! NOT the NEIGHBOR'S JOB!Our yard belongs to us,not you or your animals! WE like animal's but if you BREAK the LAWS on ANIMALS EVERDAY by Letting them CRAP in OTHER NEIGHBOR'S YARDS, pee on,or dig up their plants & flowers,which kills them,& let them RUN the STREET'S,OTHER NEIGHBORS WILL TAKE PICTURE'S & CALL ON YOU AND THEY SHOULD!Some,folks who like plants and flowers put a lot of money & time in them to have them DESTROYED by YOUR ANIMAL'S.YOU should have to pay for hired people to replace the damage,even to other neighbor's lawn furniture!FAIR!You break the LAWS,it's your FAULT! Explain,WHY do you people who own animals open your doors,let them out,turn your heads,and let them go crap in other folks yards??

Posted by: heather on Aug 2, 2008 at 01:31 PM
and Michael Vick is as easily replaced as every other athlete out there. There is always going to be someone bigger, and stronger, and faster. There a new Michael Vick born everyday that will grow to the same height, be the same race, and be just as fast. No one will care about him anymore in a few years.

Posted by: Heather on Aug 2, 2008 at 01:27 PM
and Jerome, by those standards you would be your mother's property. When you're at work you would be the company's property. When you're at a restaurant, you would be the restaurant property. Is this getting through? Also by those standards, you are implicating you are for the rape of your property, since you can do whatever you want with it. By those same standards, you are also implicating rape of your own son or daughter-if the father wanted to do that- because it is technically his property and using your own words-should be able to do whatever he wishes to do so with property. And finally-killing. Ignorant people don't think of what they're saying before they speak, even if it's for shock value. Educated people can take your words and twist everything around to where it reads the same, but sounds so much worse. Stay off of welfare, please and stay in school.

Posted by: Heather on Aug 2, 2008 at 01:17 PM
To CM: Brush up on some more words,please, to expand your "personal" dictionary. Whine is a word. (I.e. The boy whines when he doesn't get his way.) Now, back to the story: All the people that came in contact with that dog needs to be put in jail. I only wish that Huntington Police Department would do something with animal cruelty cases or attack dog cases. Instead, they do nothing and neither does the animal shelter. My neighbor neglects their dog -been calling the cops and animal shelter for almost 2 years now (since the time I've lived at this residence) at least once a week-they do nothing. Now, there was a vicious attack dog that lives across the street that would attack neighbours trying to get in or out of their car and children. Took the cops a month, animal shelter wouldn't euthanize it, and let it out in less than 2 weeks and it's still breaking free almost daily and attacking children on their bikes. GOOD JOB CITY WORKERS! What a joke.

Posted by: Vicky on Aug 2, 2008 at 11:03 AM
A dog should never ever be chained up! If you can't afford to fence in your yard, provide shelter, and proper vet check ups then you're just plain cruel and very selfish! You don't need or deserve a dog if you can't care for it!

Posted by: nicemove on Aug 2, 2008 at 12:39 AM
I was just thinking that this dog was a gift to somehow suck up to the daughter and then I came along this comment *This was a chistmas present from her aunt(dad's sister), to her to get into her good graces with her father.* Nice move aunt, I think this is a prime example of why you should not bribe kids with gifts. I'm just wondering why the father wasn't in the good graces of his daughter in the first place.

Posted by: cm on Aug 2, 2008 at 12:37 AM
this is to anonymous at 4:51pm aug1, i woulsnt call anyone else stupid. look how you spelled whine. wine is something you drink!!now who's stupid? idiot!!!

Posted by: Jerome on Aug 2, 2008 at 12:30 AM
I can not get over how you people respond to my comments. I have had numerous dogs throughout the years, some of the finest trained animals - truly athletes. Every breed has a purpose, there is nothing like the American Pit Bull. These dogs were breed for a specific purpose and love to do it, and I LOVE to watch them perform.

Posted by: Wondering in Wayne on Aug 2, 2008 at 12:03 AM
Why are we blaming a child for neglect of an animal? Please people. I don't agree with abuse of an animal, but let's face it, there is also abuse of children that don't seem to get this much attention until after it is too late. Hence, Logan Goodall. Let's think and pray for the Social Worker who lost her life. The people who are going to bed hungry and abused tonight. I think you are all going overboard over this animal. We all know it was wrong. Posting negative things about a child and her father on here will not help.

Posted by: luther on Aug 1, 2008 at 11:38 PM
i read over these comments which are supposed to be related to the dog and its master. i am suprised to see how many people care about this dog. my colt has taken care of countless problems like this, none of them ever made this much news.

Posted by: im not a luther on Aug 1, 2008 at 11:13 PM
hey luther it is safe to say your mother and father were difinately brother and sister. you are one sick and sorry individual. i hope you cannot have kids

Posted by: Karen on Aug 1, 2008 at 10:39 PM
My heart aches for Hammer. My opinion is that dogs should never be chained and that getting a dog (animal) is a life commitment. I have an 11 year old mixed breed dog who was rescued from the pound and he is part of our family. Our other mixed breed rescued dog past away last year and we still feel the void left from her not being a part of our lives. So anyone who does not believe that dogs cannot become a part of the family has never allowed themselves to experience the unconditional love that only a dog can give. My hope for Hammer is that Amber loves him enough to let him go. She has not been able to care for and protect him in the past and now she needs to let someone who can give him the attention and care that he deserves adopt him. I hope the Judge shows others who think its ok to treat animals so cruelly that they are wrong by giving Bruce Skinner the maximum penalty allowed by law. And Amber please show your love for Hammer by letting go.

Posted by: Janie on Aug 1, 2008 at 08:17 PM
I think the dog in quaetion has a higher IQ than some people posting on here. Jerome and Luther to name a couple.

Posted by: anonymous on Aug 1, 2008 at 07:51 PM
i have a dog on a chain, she gets fed every day, and petted and she is a golden retriever, we are not allowed to unchain her and we cannot keep her in the house, when we got her we could not potty train her so she had to go outside and if we had just let her run loose we would have been sued or taken to court once a month for her doing something to other people's stuff. cant have your cake and eat it too, if all you people who thinks dogs shouldn't be put on a chain, adopt them then and shut up.

Posted by: Tammi Kinman Ruppert on Aug 1, 2008 at 07:17 PM
This story is very sad and tragic. Just Because Bruce Skinner has owned dogs throughout his entire life does not mean that he knows anything about caring for them properly. As a lifelong dog owner he never learned that it is abuse to keep a dog chained. It is lonley,isolated,and for dogs who need to be with you to be happy he is either incredibly ignorant or never gave any thought to what this dog was experiencing. I hope he is never allowed to have a pet again.

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 1, 2008 at 06:27 PM
Amber is a 14 year old girl, who obeys her parents whether it may her biological dad, or her mom and stepdad. She thought her father had taken Hammer with him to his new place, she sees her dad once every few months, she does love her dog and cares very deeply for hammer. But children are taught to obey their parents, even though many do not. That is why you see children killing other children, drinking at all times of the night, smoking while underage. So don't lay the blame on a 14 yo young lady that was obeying her father. Everyone sees the news broadcasts and are not seeing the whole picture. She admits freely that her day done something wrong, but when she only sees Hammer once every 3-6 months, how would she known what the chain was doing. Blame the parent not the child. This was a chistmas present from her aunt(dad's sister), to her to get into her good graces with her father. So remember she is a child that obeys her parents, do your children obey you ?

Posted by: Huntington Resident on Aug 1, 2008 at 05:50 PM
I am sickened by this report ...true dogs are not human beings but that in NO WAY gives a person a excuse to neglect or just chain a animal up ... they need to run and play and have human contact a little petting.. my dog is so loving i just couldnt imagine him being hurt in any way ...they have feelings and if you cant properly care for a animal please dont get one ... i do hope this man is charged to the fullest but now a days people only get a fine and a slap on the wrist to not do this again ...more people need to report abuse and not stay silent ... i hope Hammer s given to a loving family where he can live out the rest of his life happy and knowing people do care... good luck Hammer best wishes to this animal

Posted by: Dog Lover on Aug 1, 2008 at 05:43 PM
these people are trash pure and simple...normal people don't ignore their pets, mine sleep with my, and have never been nor ever will be chained...I wish I could chain the Skinners from a tall tree! Luther too! idiots

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 1, 2008 at 04:51 PM
oh who cares about this dog. he should have shot it when i started getting out. so you stupid people. wouldnt have something to wine about. its just a stupid dog. im so sick of hearing all this i care stuff. when i know noone here really cares about anyone at all.

Posted by: KD on Aug 1, 2008 at 04:30 PM
THIS IS AN ANIMAL! Yes it is sad but people around here want to put more punishment on others over animals than human life.(Merrifield) If he only got home confinement for allowing a child to be abused to death then how can we as a society say this man deserves to be jailed forever. This is crazy which do you people love more your animals or your children? Get a grip and look around at our neighborhoods we certainly have more to be concerned about than a dog.... Maybe some of you should spend more time making sure your neighbors are treating their children humane!

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 1, 2008 at 04:19 PM
Luther, it is LIFE. It can feel pain and it can feel what we term emotions. Who are YOU to decide one of God's creatures is worthless. I'd trade Hammer for one like YOU any day.

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 1, 2008 at 04:18 PM
"Posted by: Jerome on Aug 1, 2008 at 09:51 AM Dogs are basically livestock. Livestock is personal property. A man has a right to do what he wants to his personal property. Since when does the government have a right to tell me what I can do with my property?" Jerome, I bet had you live 100 years ago you'd have been screaming that slaves were property too. Thank you for giving an example of the worst of appalachian stereotypes. Sorry, you do NOT have the RIGHT to abuse ANYTHING. Nice that you advocate Vicks, a felon, as an all right guy. Shows where your moral fiber is.

Posted by: luther on Aug 1, 2008 at 04:02 PM
if nobody else wants it, i'll take it. where do i pick it up at

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 1, 2008 at 03:03 PM
Why would anyone even consider giving the dog back to the owners, they haven't been there for him in the last 2 years.

Posted by: ANONYMOUS on Aug 1, 2008 at 02:49 PM
There is a chance that Hammer will be given to the owners daughter. This is all up to the Judge now, we can only pray that he does the right thing for Hammer and not let him go back to a neglected life. Were was mom in all of this. If the girl loved Hammer so much were was she months or years ago to make sure Hammer was medically ok, to give him the love and tlc that every animal deserves. Why didn't mom make sure that the girls dog was ok or take the dog if she knew he was being chained and alone. Who was taking care of Hammer for months while there was no one living in the house and mom knew this. He was ALONE!!! Anyone or anything would try to get away from this kind of treatment.

Posted by: MS on Aug 1, 2008 at 02:48 PM
Cindy, my question to you is why does 2 of your dogs get inside treatment and the other 2 have to remain outside? Let me guess, the 2 indoor dogs are little prissy lap dogs and the 2 outdoor dogs are larger not so prissy dogs. You are in a sense abusing the 2 outside dogs by playing favorites. I bet the 2 inside dogs are the ones that get the luxury of the groomer too. Shame on you!

Posted by: Michelle on Aug 1, 2008 at 02:30 PM
In my opinion, Hammer should not be given back to the owner or the owner's daughter. If the owner's daughter and ex-wife had been to see Hammer to feed or whatever, there would be no possible way for them to have missed what this poor dog was going through. I believe there is far too many GOOD dog owners out there wanting to give Hammer a good home, for you to put it back in the hands of the "FAMILY" who hurt him. For the sake of Hammer, give him a new life in a new, loving home. Michelle

Posted by: monica on Aug 1, 2008 at 01:03 PM
Here's the deal: When you have laws that allow people to chain their dogs 24/7, you set the groundwork for this kind of abuse and neglect. A chained dog is a forgotten dog. A chained dog is in isolation, rarely receiving exercise, vet care, companionship, etc. They're tormented by parasites and basically live in hell. Embedded collars or chains are actually quite common, I'm sad to report. This is one reason why cities and states are putting reasonable time limits on how long "man's best friend" can remain chained by the neck. Learn more at www.dogsdeservebetter.org

Posted by: luther on Aug 1, 2008 at 12:58 PM
folks, this is a dog. this isnt a person or anything. stop putting humanlike qualities on these animals. last time i checked, the pounds were over run with dogs and cats anyhow. its only a 4 legged animal.

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 1, 2008 at 12:30 PM
Hi Jerome, you ask Since when does the government have a right to tell me what I can do with my property? When your actions become inhumane is when the government has the right to tell you what to do. And you're wrong, livestock is not a thing, they are animals, they bleed just like you and me. Hey the blood is even the same color. Just because you own a dog, does not make it ok to treat the animal like this. Lets put a heavy chain around yours and Luthers neck and just leave it and see what the outcome is.

Posted by: anon on Aug 1, 2008 at 12:17 PM
Jerome, you need reported yourself!! YOU do not eat until your livestock eats. What kind of pathetic mess are you? Someone needs to visit your farm and see how you are treating YOUR animals. Jerk.

Posted by: Jerome on Aug 1, 2008 at 11:59 AM
Dog fighting has a long history in our culture. Mike Vick has been scapegoated. He is a talented athlete. He realizes if you mistreat animals they will not preform to the optimum. Please don't drag into this.

Posted by: Kelly on Aug 1, 2008 at 11:34 AM
I am outraged! These people make me sick!

Posted by: JD on Aug 1, 2008 at 11:31 AM
most hillbillies around here dont know how to take care of animals. jed clampett would be very upset with you Jerome. plus, animals cant feel pain can they?

Posted by: whatever on Aug 1, 2008 at 11:11 AM
If she loved the dog sooo much, then she should have taken the dog.

Posted by: Darrell on Aug 1, 2008 at 10:51 AM
Chain the guy up by the neck and forget about him. The punishment SHOULD fit the crime.

Posted by: Charr on Aug 1, 2008 at 10:43 AM
amber is guilty of nothing. very bad for mr skinner he should know better.I think fifty dollar fine would be good and community service at local animal shelter,for one weekend.compassion for all animals involved even the human ones to.

Posted by: ANONYMOUS on Aug 1, 2008 at 10:18 AM
Jerome- What kind of an idiot are you? If you have livestock, are you going to imbed chains in their necks? Are you so stupid that you don't know that something like that causes an infection and can kill your "livestock"? I would hope someone that raises livestock would have enough sense to know not to let that happen. Because when your livestock dies, you are out money. I would be more worried about losing a best friend, but then again, I am not a complete moron.

Posted by: luther on Aug 1, 2008 at 10:16 AM
im not a farmer now cawse the state took my cattle. it was a rough winter and the slick roads had kept me from being able to feed for a few days. the cattle were fine. this is why the state should stay out, it is not none of theyre busness.

Posted by: Bet on Aug 1, 2008 at 10:16 AM
Jerome, is your alias Michael Vick?? You have the same heartless mentality...and BASICALLY livestock? CRUEL AND INHUMANE treatment of ANY living creature is DEPLORABLE--just as your nescient attitude!

Posted by: Luther on Aug 1, 2008 at 10:14 AM
i was a farmer for many year. im not now but think it is unfare that the state tries to rule what we do with our farm and animals. dont they have enough to do instead of getting in my busness!!!!!

Posted by: Jerome on Aug 1, 2008 at 09:51 AM
Dogs are basically livestock. Livestock is personal property. A man has a right to do what he wants to his personal property. Since when does the government have a right to tell me what I can do with my property?

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 1, 2008 at 09:38 AM
Posted by: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2008 at 11:36 PM Leave the girl alone. She's only a child!!!!!!! BULL Time for the "child" to stop making excuses.

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 1, 2008 at 08:49 AM
Oh come on people, sure they made a mistake but criminal I don't think so!! Everyones lives are hard right now and with gas being through the roof. I have had animals before that just kept getting off the chain or breaking it and I had to keep making them bigger and tighter so I know about that but the real thing is IF this were a story on a dog that broke it's chain and attacked a child you same people would be on here wondering why the owner never made the chain tighter or even put it to sleep !!! So be true to yourself and others ! It is all we have in these days and times!!

Posted by: Sue Ellen on Aug 1, 2008 at 08:25 AM
Mr. Skinner, it is no longer up to you to decide whether you are a criminal or not. that decision rests in the hands of the justice system

Posted by: john wayne on Aug 1, 2008 at 07:39 AM
I told my golden retriever about this story and he was visibly angered I could tell he wanted to bite mr skinner .he only gets upset when golden retriever's are concerned he hates pit bull !

Posted by: just me on Aug 1, 2008 at 05:51 AM
Guess they never ruffled the fur on Hammers neck, or they would have noticed something was going on back there!

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 1, 2008 at 02:17 AM
Guess what? In this case, negligent IS criminal. Child neglect is criminal. So is animal neglect. The problem here is that people don't see animal negligent as a crime. Sure, he didn't hit the dog or beat it, but negligent IS abuse. Until people learn that, things won't change. Even the little girl says in the news report that she didn't want to put the chain on the dog that tight, she even calls it abuse in this story. If that young girl knows better, her adult father should.

Posted by: Anonymous on Aug 1, 2008 at 02:12 AM
Maybe he was trying to run away to someone who would take care of him.

Posted by: marcia on Aug 1, 2008 at 01:38 AM
there is no way he did not notice something like that. and if he didnt notice it. that means he wasnt feeding it or taking care of it.

Posted by: Maddi on Aug 1, 2008 at 01:13 AM
Both of you are responsible for the dog just cause you left him at your dad's house he was still your dog and just because your dad said don't loosen up the chain you should have been smart enough to do it anyway. I have no sympathy for either of you and both of you should have to pay a fine for the neglect of the dog and I really hope the courts do not return the dog into you or your fathers care. I've watched alot of Animal Precinct on Animal Planet to know that you can see the chain cutting into the neck of any dog no matter how long their fur is. This was really irresponsible of both of you. And Amber you are just as guilty as your dad is so stop trying to act all innocent. None of you should be allowed to have any pets.

Posted by: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2008 at 11:36 PM
Leave the girl alone. She's only a child!!!!!!!

Posted by: Concerned Citizen on Jul 31, 2008 at 11:13 PM
Negligence is a crime, even if it is an animal. They have feelings also. If the dad was unable to care the animal properly, he should have first notified the daughter. If that did not work, take him to a local animal shelter. NO ANIMAL SHOULD BE TREATED THIS WAY! What if someone would have treated the father that way.

Posted by: Candy on Jul 31, 2008 at 10:55 PM
Such a sad situation. I have 4 dogs. 2 inside and 2 outside, all dogs have their vaccines, frontline for fleas, a monthly visit to the groomers for nails and fur. They only eat purina, have toys, treats and are treated like family, and yes, they have been "fixed". Animals are expensive to take care of. If you cant afford it, then please, dont get an animal. they need love, attention and your time. I would never tie my dogs up, they run free in a fenced in yard. Not only do we love our dogs, we would know instantly if something hurt our dogs. I think it is a real shame you walked off and left your dog with a nut who refused to properly take care of the dog, then HE walked off and left it chained up..he should be staked outside for a week or so, with a heavy chain around his neck, no food or water in this heat, and see how it feels. Shame on the daugher and double shame on the dad!

Posted by: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2008 at 10:55 PM
This makes me sick! I so tired of hearing this kind of abuse! How come she has the done now? It's just really convienient that she can have the dog now but didn't want the dog for three months. As a responsible dog owner you check on your dog. Petting and giving attention to them you will find the wounds that the eye cannot see! I have 5 abused dogs and everyday we go over them to find any cuts, scrapes or anything else that should ot be there! Why is the dog living a life on a chain? She should be jailed for allowing her dog to live on a chain!

Posted by: jj on Jul 31, 2008 at 10:28 PM
No excuses, you are both equally quilty, shame on both of you.

Posted by: Mike on Jul 31, 2008 at 10:27 PM
Sure, prosecute the case vigorously, and make sure to spend as much time as possible in our courts over this one animal that will recover from this abuse. Nevermind that our tri-state continues to run rampant with drug dealers slinging crack on our streets, thugs doing drive-bys and executions and prostitutes working our corners. These issues need to take the backseat to dear Hammer's plight, because we all know that while it's much too hard to deal with this very real problems in our area, we can at least rest peacefully knowing that a crackhead's place on the docket sheet will be replaced with this, bringing to justice this vile man who makes all puppy's cower with fear. Who cares that your grandmother sleeps fearing gang members will break down her door, steal her jewelry and burn her home with her in it? At least the dogs of our area will rest comfortably knowing we have their collective backs.

Posted by: Anonymous on Jul 31, 2008 at 10:10 PM
I have the same type of dog myself. Yes, they are cover in thick hair, but anytime she's been hurt we could see. This dogs wounds were obvious to anyone who took the time to even look at the dog, fur or not. Stupid, awful excuses. Taking the dog to the pound would have been better than leaving him tied to a tree to have this happen. He says he was trying to find the dog a home, I'd love to see proof of that. These dogs can be expensive, I'm sure someone would have taken the dog off his hands for free if he really attempted to find it a home. He' just trying to thinnk quick to make up an excuse to get himself out of trouble. Let's tie him to a tree for a few months, just so he can understand what the dog went through.

Posted by: Teresa on Jul 31, 2008 at 10:10 PM
If you had bathed the dog ocassionly this would have never happened to it. Very sad for the dog and I pray it gets a home where someone would notice something so serious. Shame on you Dad and daughter!

Posted by: grover on Jul 31, 2008 at 10:10 PM
this story breaks my heart. i adore animals. anytime a stray gets dropped off on my road, i try to make sure its fed and given to a good loving home. reading this story, makes me scared about giving the next stray a new home, that could turn out to be like this one was for Hammer. Poor fella. If i didn't have 6 dogs and 2 cats already, i'd love to adopt him.

Posted by: Amanda on Jul 31, 2008 at 09:56 PM
I would be embarrassed to even say such things. I think that the daughter and the father just made things worse for themselves by saying the things that they have said. There is absloutley no excuse for this happening. If it was her dog, she should have been making sure that it was taken care of, and if he could not take care of it they both should have been responsible enough to find the poor dag a good home. There is no excuse for their behaivor.

Posted by: Pablo on Jul 31, 2008 at 09:33 PM
Wrong, Mr. Skinner. You are both negligent and criminal. You should be given the most allowed by law.

Posted by: Janie on Jul 31, 2008 at 09:07 PM
Lame excuses from father and daughter. She left the dog with Dad and Dad just plain old left the dog. They should have placed him in another home.

WSAZ Ohio News Headlines Widget
Add WSAZ Ohio Headlines to your website or social networking page. Click “options” to get the code.

Call To Check Road Conditions
·WEST VIRGINIA: (877) 982-7623
·KENTUCKY: (866) 737-3767
·OHIO: (888) 264-7623
Click here for online road conditions
WSAZ.com Sponsor Sections & Links
SOMC
Very good things are happening here
Prudential Bunch
Since 1959 unequaled performance
Moms4Moms
By moms, for moms
WV Lottery
Nightly drawings and numbers
WVA Electric
Visit our unique lighting lab
Big Sandy
For all your furniture and appliance needs
Budget Blinds
The best in custom window coverings
Smackdown Live
Watch & Win: Win 2 tickets to Smackdown Live
Healthy Tri-State
Live a healthier lifestyle in 2009

WSAZ Mobile